Monday, May 26, 2014

Joseph Backes does not acknowledge ANY photo or film alteration in the JFK assassination. 

He admits that what really happened- how Kennedy was really killed- was polar-opposite to what they claimed happened, but he thinks the photographic record totally supported the contrived story, that there was no need to alter any images. 

He thinks they concocted an elaborate story about Oswald's odyssey from Dealey Plaza, bereft with phony witnesses and bizarre details, but they never tampered with any image- not any film and not any photograph. Every image connected to the JFK assassination is as pure as the driven snow, says Joseph Backes.  

And although he claims to be an Oswald-defender, he addresses Oswald-accuser bpete as "Sir". 

You might as well have a Hatfield calling a McCoy "Sir". 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.