Friday, May 30, 2014

These two images were taken at about the same time, during the winter of 1964. The one on the left was taken by a photographer who was commissioned by Mark Lane. The one on the right was taken by the FBI. But,  the amount of hair coverage is vastly different, with much more coverage on the right. So, which one is accurate? And who do you think falsified evidence, Mark Lane or the FBI?

If you are Joseph Backes, you probably think Mark Lane falsified it. But, if you are not among the bloodied, as Backes is, then you know very well that Mark Lane never would have falsified anything, and the false image has to be the FBI photo. 

So, let's compare the hair in the FBI photo to a known picture of Lovelady from an earlier time. The image on the left is from the 1950s, with the exact year unknown. But, going by his apparent age, I would say he looks to be about 20 years old, and that would date the picture at 1957, since he was born in 1937. 


For all practical purposes, those hairlines look exactly the same. And it's not just the hairline, but the length of the hair, the style of the hair, and the cut of the hair. It's all very much the same. 

After 7 years? What are the chances of that? They would have us believe that Billy Lovelady, who was a rapidly balding young man, maintained complete stability in his hair for 7 years from 1957 and 1964, but then, in the 3 years following, it almost all fell out.


Look at the 3 of them together:



Are you buying that? Because, I'm not buying it. I don't buy that Lovelady maintained perfect stability in his hair for 7 long years when he was a rapidly balding young man and then lost it all over the following 3 years. I think they used the image on the left to fashion Lovelady's hair in the middle. 



And that was after they used it to fashion Oswald's hair in the doorway.



So, it started with Young Lovelady. They gave his hairline to Doorman, and then they had to do the same thing to FBI Lovelady.


And that leaves Mark Lane Lovelady as the real thing. Pretty sleazy, huh? Here is how Doorman originally looked, on the left:



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.