Saturday, November 22, 2014

Backass! You dumb fuck! Oliver Stone removed all those spelling errors from the telex. You didn't notice that? Idiot!

That was not right; it was not legitimate; and Oliver Stone was out of line. And he needs to read what Ralph Cinque has been saying about that fucking telex to find out how wrong he was. 

But, that stupid lying Backass is still saying that I claim that Oswald sent the telex- when I have been denying it forever and fighting people tooth and nail over it for months. 

So, let's set the record straight. I have been saying for years that OSWALD HAD NO ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE OF THE ASSASSINATION, that he was a patsy and nothing more, that he was not an informant, that he was not an under-cover agent; he was just the patsy. And I have been writing prolifically about this lately, particularly on Facebook, but also here. 

Here's one dated November 2, which is long before Backes got involved in the debate.

http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2014/11/i-am-going-to-share-response-from-oic.html


Also from November 2:

http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2014/11/if-lee-harvey-oswald-had-actually-done.html

Also from November 2:

http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2014/11/it-would-have-been-crime-for-oswald-to.html


Also from November 2:

http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2014/11/it-is-daunting-to-realize-that-if.html

From November 3:

http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2014/11/to-those-who-think-that-oswald-had.html

Also November 3:

http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2014/11/what-richard-hooke-is-really-doing-is.html

Also from November 3:

http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2014/11/i-have-mentioned-exchange-between.html

And there are countless more, both before and after that. But look what the shit-faced mother-fucker put up:



I said Oswald sent it?????????? Are you out of your mind????? I've been fighting it on multiple forums for months. This God-damn bastard has got no other recourse but to bold-faced lie, and not just to lie, but to flip reality on its head, turn it up side down.

And don't quote dialogue from a 1991 movie to me, asshole. That isn't research. What JFK researcher today, other than Judyth Baker and her followers, say that Oswald sent the telex? And what JFK researcher today besides YOU says that Hoover sent it after hearing from Oswald? 

Did you read the post I put up explaining why it's just as moronic to say that Hoover sent it? Read it again, asshole. Jesus Christ! Even when something is spelled out to you, you still cling to the impossible. And then you try to find refuge in Oliver Stone's movie?????  Idiot!

Alright, so now we know that Joseph Backass the researcher, the investigator, the JFK analyst, thinks that it is a legitimate FBI telex that J. Edgar Hoover sent and that it's based on information that he received from none other than Lee Harvey Oswald. So, let's examine it as the work of J. Edgar Hoover. 



First, Hoover said that it was a threat to "assisinate" President Kennedy in Dallas on November 22 or 23. Regarding the spelling error, no matter how bad Hoover's spelling was, you don't think that he actually sat down in front of the telex and typed it out himself, do you, Backes? Don't you think that somebody else did that? So, even if his original note had such appalling spelling, wouldn't the operator have fixed it? Wouldn't the operator have been used to fixing such errors? Or, do you think the operator just typed it out exactly as Hoover wrote it, errors and all? 

And if the attack was going to take place in Dallas, wouldn't it have to have been on November 22? Why bring up November 23? Wasn't Kennedy going to spend the night in San Antonio? So, if the attack was going to be in Dallas, it had to be the 22nd? Right? And didn't Hoover know that? 

Continuing, the letter says that a "militant revolutionary group" was going to attack the President. So, you think Hoover got that from Oswald? But, why would Oswald say it was a "militant revolutionary group"? If Oswald knew anything, why wouldn't he be specific and say exactly who it was? Why wouldn't he name names? Why would he say a militant revolutionary group? And how is that the least bit helpful? If the source isn't specific, what are you supposed to do with "militant revolutionary group"? 

Then, there is a reference to JFK's "proposed" trip to Dallas on November 22-23. Proposed? Listen up, Backes: if it's 6 months or a year away, you can talk about the trip being "proposed." But, when it's just a few days off, and this was November 17, it's way beyond the point of "proposed." It isn't a "proposed" trip; it is a scheduled trip; it is in the hopper. Nobody would use the word "proposed" when it's that close- not Hoover, not Oswald, and not anybody. 

Now, are you starting to see why I think the whole thing is a hoax?

Then it has the word "logical" instead of "local" and it's hard to imagine J. Edgar Hoover making that mistake. Then, it refers to "racial and hate groups." So, it goes from "militant revolutionary groups" to "racial and hate groups" as if there is a natural connection between the two. But why? Racial groups are like the Ku Klux Klan. And hate groups are like, I don't know, anti-gay groups? (Sorry for touching a nerve.) But, what the hell? How is any of this relevant? How would it have been helpful? For Christ's sake: if he thought the President's life was in danger, and it was already November 17,  what good would it do to start looking into hate groups on November 17? At that point, wouldn't you just cancel the President's trip? And why would you put IN WRITING such a stupid course of action as the letter orders?

You're dumb as dirt, Backes. That letter could not possibly have been sent by Oswald (which you admit) but it makes absolutely no sense for it to have been sent by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover either. 

What does it leave? It leaves fraud, Backes. It's a fraudulent letter. It's a hoax.  It happens. 

But go ahead, say it again. Tell us why you think it's a real telex from J. Edgar Hoover to the SACs based on information provided by Lee Harvey Oswald. You dumb fuck.    








No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.