Monday, October 26, 2015

There are two things I included in the new video which I am very glad I did.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5xmwfN1zoI

The first is I'm glad I included that there isn't any other place plausible for Oswald to have been except the doorway. Not once has anyone fighting me ever even proffered such a place. No one has ever said: "Oswald wasn't in the doorway at the time of the shots because he was at X." (lonenutters excepted, of course)

It's as though Oswald was immaterial, dwelling in the ether, suspended in the song of the spheres. He didn't need a place. He didn't have to be anywhere.   

The second thing I'm most glad I included in the video is that if you are an Oswald defender, you MUST recognize photographic alteration in the JFK assassination. And that's because of the Backyard photos.



Now listen up: That's the murder weapon he is brandishing there, the rifle that was found on the 6th floor. And, it appears that Oswald is holding it 8 months before the crime, even though he denied ever ordering it, ever owning, or ever seeing it. So, if that photo is legitimate, then Oswald can't be innocent. If you think Oswald was framed and innocent, then you MUST assert that that photo was faked. 

You hear me, Backes?

You hear me, Farley?

You hear me, Norwood?


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.